Create a Compliance Test for Interviews
You can create a simple test deal file and pop quiz to administer during the interview process that will tell you how compliant the applicant really is, vis-a-vis your compliance standards.

You can create a simple test deal file and pop quiz to administer during the interview process that will tell you how compliant the applicant really is, vis-a-vis your compliance standards.
A set of recent psychological experiments assert that people may give socially acceptable answers instead of honest answers when they are under time constraints. And although applicants for sales and F&I manager positions are not necessarily under time constraints, many will claim during the interview process that they believe in compliance, because they think it is what you want to hear.
Another issue when trying to determine an applicant’s compliance quotient is the wide range of industry beliefs of what compliance is or is not. Often when auditing a dealership or a manager for the first time, many of the violations are frequently a knowing issue. The dealer or manager simply was not aware of the compliance requirement.
A good example is when a manager will accept a down payment from a third party (not a straw purchaser) and does not run an OFAC check on the third party. OFAC requires a check on anyone you do business with, not only the parties on the contract. Many newer managers or dealerships to a compliance process are unaware of that requirement.
If you want to determine the applicant’s compliance quotient, give them a test. You can create a simple test deal file and pop quiz to administer during the interview process that will tell you how compliant the applicant really is, vis-a-vis your compliance standards.
Step One
The first step is to figure out which potentially deceptive practices, best practices, state, or federal laws you want to test the applicant on. At a minimum, you should consider:
Desking process, including payment packing
Power booking
Credit application fraud
FACT Act
Truth in Lending Act
Used Car Rule
Red Flag Rule
OFAC
Menu execution
State requirements such as California Car Buyer’s Bill of Rights or Michigan Repeat Offender
Step Two
Create a test deal file which includes examples of documents that a plaintiff’s attorney or the attorney general could use as a smoking gun. Use generic names such as Ellen Example and Tommy Test. Examples should include the critical paper trail documents (desking worksheets, menus, retail installment sales contracts, and voluntary protection document registration forms), used car buyer’s guides, credit applications, Red Flags and OFAC reports, and book-out sheets.
Be sure to redact the dealership’s information if you create the test documents at one of your dealerships.
Step Three
Have a little fun with a pop quiz. Regardless of the psychological study, a pop quiz with simple answers and time constraints may shed light on the level of compliance understanding the interviewee has. Here are some sample questions:
Warranty or vehicle service contract?
What do you do with a dead deal?
What’s the best way to structure a straw purchase?
What contract date is used on a recontract?
Is it OK to accept a Matricula card for identity?
When is it acceptable to use “Signature on File”?
How do you handle housing expense for a joint mortgage?
Is the owner of a small business the same as the manager of the company?
Some state specific examples:
Vehicle history disclosure
NMVTIS (CA)
Child support liens (ND)
Manufacturer specific examples:
Non-OEM VSC disclosures (GM, Chrysler)
Export
Step Four
Have your attorney and/or human resources expert review the test deal file and pop quiz, and provide the appropriate disclosures before you start administering it.
Step Five
Determine what is required to achieve a passing grade. It might not be reasonable to expect that your applicant is going to catch every compliance issue you throw at him. Conversely, it might not be reasonable to expect to hire an applicant that cannot catch any compliance issue by looking at examples or failing the pop quiz.
Final Step
Scan your examples into a PDF file so that the test can be printed for each applicant instead of making copies of copies of copies.
Stay safe, good luck, and good selling!
Gil Van Over is the executive director of Automotive Compliance Education (ACE). He is also the founder and president of gvo3 & Associates.
Originally posted on Agent Entrepreneur
More Compliance

Dealer Ads and the FTC
The agency has made it clear in recent enforcement actions and warnings, in auto retail and other industries, that advertised prices must include all nonoptional costs to the consumer.
Read More →
AAMS Training and Mosaic Compliance Services Merge
The strategic combination is intended to expand technology-driven compliance solutions for the automotive industry.
Read More →
The Jurisprudence of Pricing
Legal concept helps makes sense of California’s recently passed version of the failed federal CARS legislation.
Read More →
Trump 2.0 and Enforcement Priorities
The upshot is don’t relax, because regulation indeed continues.
Read More →
June Is Automotive Service Professionals Month
Observance is opportunity to thank technicians for their crucial role in auto retail.
Read More →
Cox Automotive Releases Compliance Guide
New edition walks auto dealers through relevant regulations for 2025.
Read More →
Trump 2.0 and Retail Automotive
Administration’s plans should generally bode well for the industry.
Read More →
CARS Rule Update: 5th Circuit Oral Arguments Recap
In this video, Jim Ganther of Mosaic Compliance Services, recaps the key takeaways from the oral arguments in the critical CARS Rule case, including potential outcomes and what dealers should do to stay ahead of compliance changes.
Read More →
State of the CARS Rule, Part 3
The players in the automotive industry should coordinate their responses to this pending regulation.
Read More →
The Future of Car Dealer Documents
Where forms, documents, agreements and contracts could be in 50 years.
Read More →